Prediction of Marjorie Cox Crawford vs Nell Hopman Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Cox Crawford vs N. Hopman

Marjorie Cox Crawford

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

116

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Nell Hopman

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

116

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Crawford 1 - 0 Hopman

They have played 6 sets in total, with Marjorie Cox Crawford winning 6 and Nell Hopman winning 0. The last match between Marjorie Cox Crawford and Nell Hopman was at the Sydney Strathfield, 02-10-1929, Round: R4, Surface: N/A, with Marjorie Cox Crawford getting the victory 6-3 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Crawford	1
Hopman	0

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(R4) Sydney Strathfield(10-02-29)

Stats

Marjorie Cox Crawford

Nell Hopman

() Sydney(04-28-28)

Stats

Marjorie Cox Crawford

Nell Hopman

(SF) Sydney City(04-13-28)

Stats

Marjorie Cox Crawford

Nell Hopman

M. C. Crawford vs N. Hopman H2H Profile

M. C. Crawford	Stats	N. Hopman
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
68.22% (73-34)	Career Total W/L	54.93% (312-256)
1	Grass	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. C. Crawford vs N. Hopman Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marjorie Cox Crawford has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Nell Hopman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marjorie Cox Crawford, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nell Hopman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Marjorie Cox Crawford has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nell Hopman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Marjorie Cox Crawford has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Nell Hopman winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Marjorie Cox Crawford has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 80% (W/L 4/1), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 63% (W/L 12/7). Nell Hopman has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 80% (W/L 46/26), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 40/60).
Player level: In the last year, Marjorie Cox Crawford has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Nell Hopman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Marjorie Cox Crawford winning 3 times and Nell Hopman being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Marjorie Cox Crawford winning 6 and Nell Hopman winning 0.
The last match between Marjorie Cox Crawford and Nell Hopman was at the Sydney Strathfield, 02-10-1929, Round: R4, Surface: N/A, with Marjorie Cox Crawford getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marjorie Cox Crawford has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Nell Hopman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marjorie Cox Crawford has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nell Hopman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Marjorie Cox Crawford has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nell Hopman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Marjorie Cox Crawford vs Nell Hopman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. C. Crawford vs N. Hopman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. C. Crawford	Stats	N. Hopman
3	H2H Matches Won	0
6	Sets Won	0
36	Games Won	13
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (3/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/3)
100% (3/3)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/3)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/3)

Recent Performance Stats

M. C. Crawford Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Sydney - 01-02-1930
R4 Emily WestacottE. Westacott	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
R3 Unknown PlayerU. Player	W	6-1 6-0	Stats
Sydney Interstate - 31-01-1930
Robin Gladys ToyneG. Toyne	W	6-3 6-3	Stats
Robin Sylvia LanceS. Lance	L	6-4 7-5	Stats
Australian Championships - 18-01-1930
Emily WestacottE. Westacott	L	7-5 6-4	Stats

View All

N. Hopman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Berkeley - 26-09-1966
R3 Diana GaiD. Gai	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
Los Angeles - 15-09-1966
R3 Ingrid BentzerI. Bentzer	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
Knokke - 08-08-1966
R4 Michele KahnM. Kahn	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Hilversum - 18-07-1966
R3 Lidy VenneboerL. Venneboer	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Bastad - 03-07-1966
R4 Liv HubertL. Hubert	L	6-2 2-6 6-4	Stats

View All

M. C. Crawford vs N. Hopman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. C. Crawford	Stats	N. Hopman
68.22% (73/34)	YTD Win/Loss	54.93% (312/256)
64.29% (153/85)	Sets Win/Loss	54.54% (685/571)
56.05% (1250/980)	Games Win/Loss	52.62% (5895/5307)
0% (0/0)	Hard Win/Loss	54.55% (18/15)
80.00% (4/1)	Clay Win/Loss	40.00% (40/60)
68.67% (57/26)	Grass Win/Loss	57.30% (208/155)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
57.14% (8/6)	Slam W/L	50.43% (59/58)
69% (72/105)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (297/548)
0% (0/0)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	50% (1/2)
72% (18/25)	Deciding Set Win %	43% (66/152)
94% (64/60)	1st Set Won, Won Match	83% (316/263)
6% (64/4)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	17% (316/53)
31% (42/13)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	16% (236/37)